WATCH TALK FORUMS banner

1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,752 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
From the current europastar.com:

We won’t go into detail, in this column, about the dramatic shockwaves travelling through the world of watch auctions. We are not looking to weigh the good and bad points or to sort out the complex tangle of recent events. We are also not going to accuse or exonerate the players. The Antiquorum affair is too confused and still too ‘hot’ to try and draw any definitive conclusions.
But there is a lesson in all of this: watch auctions have become one of the central tactics used by the world of timekeeping; they are one of the principal places where brands’ reputations are made and unmade. Similar to what is happening in the world of art, where the value of an artist is judged by the rising or falling prices of his or her pieces at auction, the absolute ‘value’ of a watch brand is more or less tied to its products’ bidding performance at auction.
Is this reasonable or fair?
We can legitimately ask this question, and for several reasons. First of all, by wanting to imitate the world of art, watchmaking forgets that it is only partially an art. If subjectivity is an essential part of the appreciation of art, closely linked to the tastes of the times and to fashions, it is not the same for watchmaking. (In this regard, we should remember that the two big winners in art auctions, Van Gogh and Gauguin, both died in the most miserable of conditions. And it is perhaps a safe bet that one of the current darlings of the art world, the American kitsch artist Jeff Koons, will not be worth much in a few decades.)
We don’t ask an artistic work to be, above all, ‘well made’. It must be strong, powerful, representative of its epoch, and a witness to its times while being at odds with it. On the other hand, we ask a watch to be, most of all, technically irreproachable, aesthetically appealing, meticulously crafted, and as precise as possible. A watch is essentially an artisanal product, not an artistic product. A timepiece is also always, or nearly always, the fruit of a joint collaboration. In this sense, the quoted value of a timepiece listed at auction is somewhat misleading because it gives too much importance to an aspect, which although significant, should remain secondary in determining the value of a watch - its subjectivity and irration-ality. Secondly, in trying to make its auction prices rise, watchmaking runs the risk of artificially inflating its value and thus exposes itself to the fatal bursting of the bubble it helped create. After the bubble bursts, the highest prices at that moment will thus see their real value decline below what is rational.
Although auctions have, over the last ten years, greatly contributed to the recognition of watches as objects worthy of being collected by a growing number of people, they have, in a way, reached their limits. Auctions have thus become a weapon that could very well turn against the industry as a whole. This was shown by a recent article in the Wall Street Journal. Although strongly contested—and contestable on a number of points—this article casts suspicion on the transparency of watch auction sales, claiming that they are manipulated by the brands themselves.
But as the proverb says, ‘mud sticks’. By trying too hard to raise prices, watchmaking risks one day to see itself in trouble, for the best or worst reasons.
So, let us return to good sense: watches are not made by cursed, impoverished, or impassioned artists. Watches are made by meticulous artisans and smart businessmen—but this does not take away one ounce of the passion that timekeepers deserve.


Source: Europa Star December-Januar 2008 Magazine Issue
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
634 Posts
Great article. I agree with the notion that there is a difference between "watches and art" (to put it crudely). I think that it is a contrivance that borders on the embarrassing, to use the secondary market for watches as some kind of "art auction" to inflate the prices of goods that are not unique in themselves.

The comparison to the art world usually points to the notion that if a Picasso work commands a high price at auction, other works by the same artist will rise by association. This is a red herring, or a flawed syllogism, if you will.

The proper comparison is if Picasso's Guernica sells for a huge premium over its original MSRP, then the other Guernicas should follow. In fact, the new Guernicas can justify an inflated MSRP in the primary market, now that demand in the secondary market is higher. Now that just sounds absurd. We're reducing a unique work of art to the status of a manufactured item, meant to be turned for a profit....oh, wait...watches are consumer goods, made to sell in the retail market.

Seen in its true form, without all of the self-important hype and snobbery, the comparison simply falls apart.

Well, that's as far as I can think right now...unresolved, no conclusion yet, but it's a good start.

Great thread, I hope it sparks some lively debate.:biggrin:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,431 Posts
Art by it's very nature is not often "well made". People throw around the phrase, "this watch is truly a work of art" quite often, and quite gratuitously. I think a watch by it's very nature is the antithesis of true art.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
634 Posts
Interesting. Reminds me of the watch company (Omega?) that bid enormous amounts recently for their own watch to put in a museum.
That's exactly what this is all about. Push the price of production pieces through the roof by associating it with the capriciousness of the art world. Apples to oranges...but it's all fruit, right?:001_unsure: If you can successfully sell that to your market, I've got a bridge...:laugh:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,704 Posts
It is well known that auctions are the poorest place to buy anything.

Many will tell you that Patek is the highest form of wrist horology, but their and Omega's Antiquorum fiasco has soured both brand's flavor to my taste. I can't help how I feel on shadowy behavior, it is who I am.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,752 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
It is well known that auctions are the poorest place to buy anything.

Many will tell you that Patek is the highest form of wrist horology, but their and Omega's Antiquorum fiasco has soured both brand's flavor to my taste. I can't help how I feel on shadowy behavior, it is who I am.
This was a sharp stick in the auctioneer - and both brands' - eyes.

:sneaky2:
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top