WATCH TALK FORUMS banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

Registered
Joined
2,151 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Great photos wilfreb. good write up, too. i was interested in your side by side with the tag
thanks for sharing - and congrats!
yes bos, if you look closely the aquaracer has better attention to detail mainly on the dial and case back.

the seamaster have some flaws on the dial, like the lume applying is off the line and the printing isn't as god as the aquaracer.

the aquaracer's dial is perfectly flawlessas as well as te caseback.

i prefer the aquaracer bracelet, feels more solid and better finished, but the seamaster's clasp in unbeatable.

also the aquaracer wears larger, both being 41mm.

again, with omega you have a more prestigious name and a chronometer movement.
 

Registered
Joined
354 Posts
Hey Wilfredo, how are the scalloped bezels on both watches? Are they easy to turn with dry/wet hands? Can you compare it to a coin edge bezel like, for example, your 8926OB or a scalloped 8926? (grip factor, not quality, of course.)
 

Registered
Joined
2,151 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
Hey Wilfredo, how are the scalloped bezels on both watches? Are they easy to turn with dry/wet hands? Can you compare it to a coin edge bezel like, for example, your 8926OB or a scalloped 8926? (grip factor, not quality, of course.)
the omega scalloped bezel turns easily, at first was a little hard but now its perfect, the coin edge bezel have much better grip, my invictas are easier to turn than the seamaster and the aquaracer.
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top