WATCH TALK FORUMS banner

1 - 1 of 1 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,752 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Fellow WTF member and esteemed stalwart of
BreitlingLand
, Cinq posted a refreshing comparative review of the IWC St Exupery and Breitling Navitimer chronographs today and here they are, immortalised forever

Thanks Cinq - Great stuff my friend.



Hi there,

Today, I am going to compare apples and pears. Normally, this is something people want to avoid but let's try it anyway.



The objects I compare are my Breitling Navitimer and my IWC St Exupery Chrono. You decide which one is apple or pear, I love fruit!

First, some similarities:

- Both are based on a Valjoux 7750 movement, automatic winding with about 42 hours of power reserve
- Both have the movement modified by the manufacturer
- Both have a chrono, allowing timings of up to twelve hours and with an accuracy of 1/4 of a second
- Both my watches are running very accurate and deviate less than a second per day
- Both are stainless steel



Now some differences:

Breitling has changed the layout of the subdials to the so-called 'tri-compax' layout. This has several other consequenses: the quick-set date function has been sacrificed and the date window has been moved from 3 to between 4 and five. There is no day display either. The numbers 1 to 9 for the days are displayed perpendicular to the central axis of the watch, the numbers 10 to 31 are rotated 90 degrees. This way, the numbers 1 to 9 are a bit bigger and allow for better use of the space of the date-window.

IWC has kept the layout of the subdials as it was originally on the Valjoux 7750 with the quick-set date function and the day too. IWC does other modifications to the movement which make it run smoother and allow for a weaker main spring to be used. This reduces internal forces on all components of the movement.

Breitling has added a sliderule. If you learn a few basic tricks, multiplication and division are easy operations. The water resistance does suffer from the sliderule and is only 30 meters.

IWC has a better water resistance rating of 60 meters but the St Exupery Chrono looks best on a strap and I won't go swimming with a strap. It does have a screw-in crown.





The engravings on the back of the Navitimer allow the user to convert degrees Celcius to degrees Farenheit and the other way around. The back of the St Exupery Chrono shows a portrait of St Exupery and that it's a limited edition with the number (1630 were made in the steel version). The lugs of the Navitimer are shorter and thinner, thus having a smaller gap between the strap and the case. The case of the ST Exupery Chrono is mainly brushed with a few polished parts such as the outer rim of the bezel and the edges of the lugs.





The crown of the Navitimer is not screwed down. This is not necessary because the weakest point in the water resistance equation is the slide rule dial.

The dial of the Navitimer is considered 'cluttered' by some but all markings are usefull and the chronograph can be accurately read all around the dial. It also has a tachymeter scale and the markings for the sliderule. The sliderule has some red elements that allow for quick conversions between landmiles, nautical miles and kilometers. The starting-point at 10 is also indicated in red. The dial of my Navitimer has the Baton markers but a version with arabics is available too. SuperLuminova is applied to the hour- and minute hands and to the tips of the applied Baton markers at 12 (a double), 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10 and 11.



The dial of the St Exupery has big arabics at 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10 and 11. Some are cut off a bit. The running second subdial is smaller and of the same color as the main part of the dial. SuperLuminova with a beautiful blue color is applied to all the arabics, the markers at 12, 3, 6 and 9 and to all the hands except for the chrono second hand.



The two chrono subdials are grey and the idea of this design was to have them look like spinning propellors. At the 5 minute marks at 5, 10, 20, 25, 35, 40, 50 and 55 have these numbers dislpayed. Unfortunately, there are no sub-second indications there so it is harder to really accurately read the chronograph.

Both watches have anti-reflective coating on in- and outside of the sapphire crystal that allow for easy reading of the time under any angle. There is however a big difference when taking pictures: the Breitling suffers much less from reflections and allows for pictures of the dial at very sharp angles.



As you can see, I am currently using the bracelet on the Navitimer. It is very comfortable. The Navitimer does look very good on a strap too. Breitling has a great deployant clasp for their straps that allows for fine adjustments and it doesn't use holes in the strap. It is a bit less comfortable than a strap with a buckle though. The bracelet has micro adjustments. Adding or removing links is a job that takes some time and patience.



The St Exupery Chrono comes with a strap and buckle. At first, it felt a bit thin, compared to the Breitling straps I have but it is very comfortable. Other people have tried the IWC steel bracelet on the St Exupery Chrono but it doesn't look right. The Havana dial cries for the brown strap! I have tried the IWC deployant clasp at my AD but my wrist is too thin. It is also substantially more expensive than the Breitling deployant clasp. I don't know the IWC bracelet but from what I've heard, it's a great bracelet and can be easily adjusted.

Well, that's it for now. I hope you like this little comparison and make sure you get your daily portion of Vitamins!

Kind regards,

Cinq
 
1 - 1 of 1 Posts
Top