Hey Zin,
I agree with your last statement: Why not put the new Si14 balance wheel in the Gents AT? You would think that it would require very little reworking of the movement. Perhaps it has something to do with the balance spring or pinions. Who knows?:001_unsure: But I sure would like to.:biggrin: I'm sure Omega would have used it if it was this simple.
I also think the introduction of new materials highlights where Omega want to be in the future: At the very top of horological developments.
It's nice to know that they were prepared to take the risks involved with the Co-Axial movement. It is also nice to know that they are capable of making their own movements, dedicated to the Co-Axial movement. It is now also nice to know that they are willing to invest time and money into developing new materials, etc that can only benefit the longevity and time keeping of their watches.
The future's bright.:biggrin:
I agree with your last statement: Why not put the new Si14 balance wheel in the Gents AT? You would think that it would require very little reworking of the movement. Perhaps it has something to do with the balance spring or pinions. Who knows?:001_unsure: But I sure would like to.:biggrin: I'm sure Omega would have used it if it was this simple.
I also think the introduction of new materials highlights where Omega want to be in the future: At the very top of horological developments.
It's nice to know that they were prepared to take the risks involved with the Co-Axial movement. It is also nice to know that they are capable of making their own movements, dedicated to the Co-Axial movement. It is now also nice to know that they are willing to invest time and money into developing new materials, etc that can only benefit the longevity and time keeping of their watches.
The future's bright.:biggrin: