I'd put this in the 'acceptable' category. Although the design screams 'Rolex', there has never been a Rolex Pepsi Submariner, so I'd say you are in the clear.
Good watch; thanks for sharing. ;o)
Good watch; thanks for sharing. ;o)
C'mon, Presa canary; what didja expect for a cheap Chinese beater? I'd say it's pretty nice, considering the price and all.The watch is hideous. Wear it in good health
I'm sure they will soon enough, especially if someone dares post a blatant copy of an already established brand with the brand's name replaced with some other name (think Parnis or Alpha). I know this is within the rules, as well as within the established definition of 'homage'. That said, it's still wrong in my book. I know it's legal, but then again so is going to a dead soldier's funeral and stamping on the American flag whilst bellowing like an ox about how God hates everything. Legal does not make right and illegal does not make wrong - just ask Rosa Parks or Martin Luther King.The mods have to be pretty disappointed that they didn't get to do any of their mod stuff.
If you mean the OP, it's a blend of the GMT Master II (the Pepsi part) and the Submariner (the markings on the bezel).What watch is being paid homage to?:confused1:
I didn't notice, but thanks for bringing it up. Yeah, that Loki is an acceptable homage in any case. ;o)OK, this thread seems to have run it's course and everyone is to be commended for their adult behavior. but, one more thing. I'm not sure anyone noticed, though SemperEadem came close, that the watch does not have R---x hands ?