Joined
·
9,135 Posts
What are you thoughts on this one?
http://www6.comcast.net/sports/articles/general/2008/01/14/OLY.RUN.IAAF.Pistorius/
http://www6.comcast.net/sports/articles/general/2008/01/14/OLY.RUN.IAAF.Pistorius/
I agree...An odd, but wonderful world, when a man with no legs can be considered to have an advantage in an athletic event. But he should be banned. At least the way I read the rules.
It's very likely that these devices could be designed for those who have feet and it would almost certainly be deemed an advantage for a runner in that situation because of the added spring provided by the materials in the device.Brueggemann found that Pistorius was able to run at the same speed as able-bodied runners on about a quarter less energy. The professor said that once the runners hit a certain stride, athletes with artificial limbs needed less additional energy than other athletes.
The professor determined that the returned energy from the prosthetic blade is "close to three times higher than with the human ankle joint in maximum sprinting." The IAAF adopted a rule last summer prohibiting "technical aids" deemed to give an athlete an advantage.
http://msn.foxsports.com/olympics/story/7658380?MSNHPHCP>1=10838